“Web Giants Threaten to End Cookie Tracking”
What a great title
and spin on what is really going on here…brilliant really.
Today’s WSJ article
discussed Microsoft’s, Facebook’s, and Google’s development of systems to
control the flow of cookies across their respective browsers, applications, and
operating systems greatly changing the $120B digital advertising industry; an
industry that relies extensively on advertising company's use of cookies to gather user data
which it in turn sells to businesses. Now, these web giants are taking back control
of cookies, hurting the ad companies, and its being spun as a step to increase user security.
To be fair, it could improve user privacy and security by
controlling the amount of companies with access to user internet use, and in turn "everything about us" as we've been discussing, but there is
something much bigger going on here. By limiting advertising company’s ability
to track cookies, Microsoft, Google, and Facebook can now sell this information
to businesses. They have effectively integrated
across the stack (again) by removing access to a level that they control (the OS’s, browsers
and Apps). Once again these companies
will be able to garner revenues from a layer they were previously only
providing access through at no cost.
But what makes this truly beneficial (or perhaps diabolical),
is that its being spun as a good thing for the consumer and overlooks another
example of the tech world’s biggest companies taking more control of revenues across the stack. Is this “fair”? Does this strategy/marketing help ensure that
advertising companies can’t wage a propaganda war on the tech giants?
No comments:
Post a Comment