Gartner recently conducted a study of global, enterprise
EHR system leaders, and came up with a conceptual map, displaying the leaders,
visionaries, and niche players. Not surprisingly, Epic and Cerner are the
favorites, occupying the “Leaders” quadrant, so named for its ability to
execute and completeness of vision, while slightly smaller companies like
Siemens, Meditech and Intersystems win the title of “Visionaries”.
Conspicuously absent from the list are other big players in the EHR space, such
as G.E. Centricity and athenahealth. The omissions are based on international
reach: only systems that are marketed and sold in more than one continent were
considered.
In terms of strategy going forward, ability to
execute and completeness of vision are both very important aspects of EHR
system leaders, but which will be required to stay on top? My guess is that
completeness of vision will matter most in the coming years. When we’re talking
about the most successful companies, variances in ability to execute will be
small. All top companies must be near excellence in their ability to deploy,
maintain, and upgrade their systems.
The real difference enters into a company’s
ability not only to, as Gartner describes, understand buyer needs and translate
those needs into products and services. These companies must also create
products and services that actually deliver what the market demands. Population
health management and other analytics services may claim to identify risk
pools, but to deliver requires accuracy of vision, not just adding another
catch-phrase to a system’s list of services.
It would be most interesting to see how you position the companies in your table on the grid today but also how these companies may move in the near future.
ReplyDelete